40有理由支持枪支管制

清单的40有理由支持枪支管制，现在相当长。迈克尔威廉姆森把大量时间和精力到维护这种宝贵的参考自由爱好者。

这令人感到惊讶什么人相信相信在枪支管制

由Michael卓威廉姆森

这一事件，人们打出罪犯自卫是非常罕见的，并且不应当被用来作为借口，自己的枪，就像事件，总统新闻秘书被枪杀是非常罕见的，并且不应当被用来作为借口，禁止枪。
这枪的真正原因是犯罪，但我们将引咎监狱的业主说，枪的犯罪，即使业主没有参与的人。
一个丑角将杀了你，在半秒钟需要借鉴的皮套，但不会伤害你，而你拨打911的手机，通话的调度，并等待一个半小时的警察到达。
这枪的控制工程，这就是为什么不存在非法武器在北爱尔兰或贝鲁特。
，第二次修订只适用于flintlocks ，正如美国宪法第一修正案只适用于quills和铅字。
，适当的回应攻击是要叫警察，只是手无寸铁的警察，因为“没有解决任何暴力行为。 ”
这是错误的，使讥讽，歧视妇女的意见，除非评论谁对妇女自己的枪。
这枪的11发弹弹匣是危险的，但枪15 10轮杂志是更加安全。
我们应该恢复罪犯对待他们的人，但从来没有让他们自己的枪，即使他们的犯罪是非暴力的。
一个劫机者很可能采取枪远离试点，但数百名乘客随后将无法枪远离劫机者。
如果有希望被枪乘坐美洲航空公司93号航班，有人可能会受到伤害。
飞行员有足够的做在驾驶舱内，而不必担心干扰像枪支停止劫机者和灭火器阻止大火，这些活动应由“训练有素的专业人士。 ”
这种“训练有素的专业人士”将仅在一次飞行中的五个。
这不是有试点的人类生命危险拍摄的劫机者，我们应该仅仅是空军击落的飞机，从而维护生命。
这强奸犯愿意攻击武装妇女，以便他们能够采取的枪支，并利用它们对受害者。
1枪支所有者将在10000犯下的暴力行为，在他或她的一生，这是更为可怕的超过了25 ％的司机谁会造成严重或致命的事故。
您应该依靠警察，以代替您的枪，就像你要依靠牙医代替牙刷。
报告说，按射击是“负责任的” ，但没有报告说，射击是停止武装冲突公民是企图防止“美化枪。 ”
这车钥匙，雨伞和发胶是好的工具，是为了自卫，尽管警察继续携带枪支。
华盛顿特区的谋杀案率低80.6每100000是由于严格的枪支管制，但弗吉尼亚州阿灵顿的高谋杀率的百分之一点六100000的原因是缺乏枪支管制。
该抑郁和情绪不安不应该允许自己的枪，开枪子弹二百五十零英尺-英镑的能源，但应该让自己的四○○○磅汽车一百一十三点六○万英尺-英镑的能源（ 65英里）。
这种“攻击性武器”是“非常强大” ，但奇怪的大游戏猎人喜欢0.30 - 06秒和0.375汉鼎敏。
这种步枪是“不足”的狩猎，但可以“冲警察防弹衣。 ” 更强大的猎枪，但是，不能。
我们应该取缔防弹背心，使犯罪分子无法使用他们，和公民个人应当然后感到自豪的是，交火中丧生，知道他们在做自己的社会。
，我们并不需要的第二项修正案或武器来保护我们的宪法，而应利用法院和政府系统，就像我们在1776年。
，缺乏提枪在遗嘱殖民地美国城市的证明，大多数美国人并没有他们自己的，就像没有提及outhouses证明，大多数人蹲在院子里。
据称，这是缺乏所有权有关的第二次修订的缺乏兴趣的报纸当时有关宪法第一修正案。
，在数以百计的记录案件反枪怪胎我们注意到：新闻秘书被逮捕手枪控制在直流履行非法手枪，排名区域主任万伦3月被裁定重罪攻击，和其他百万低能在科罗拉多州被逮捕攻击枪支经销商和活动，但“枪坚果”是“沉迷于暴力。 ”
该法律的具体命名武器已被发现不符合宪法，该法对“类型”的武器已被认为是含糊不清，使法律对化妆品的特点是容易遵守仍然产生相同的机制，并针对特定的法律机制是违宪的，这表明了“ obsessiveness ”枪支爱好者做他们喜欢做，对意愿的狭隘prudes谁希望阻止他们，而不是说明obsessiveness的无知偏执狂谁害怕他们。
美国航天局，军事，生理学家，解剖学家和培训人员都同意和奥林匹克分数确认男子平均有极大更多上肢力量比女性，但女性应尽量为自己辩护的武术，而不是枪。
根据调查报告，警报系统的价格昂贵，往往很容易失败，报警公司可能无法应付3个小时，即使在那时只有驾驶的，而不是停止，而是一个警报系统是一个更可靠的手段保护家庭比枪支。
不太枪支争吵是一件好事，所以你不应该武装冲突对刑事犯罪保持自己的安全。
这不是花几百美元的枪支和一个下午学习如何使用它，而不是一个应该花费数千美元和几年来学习武术，所以你会做好充分准备，以打击任何人，只要他们在您的性别分工和重量级。
这是可怕的工厂时，警察对嫌疑人的武器，使他们能逮捕，但我们应该有更严厉的法律武器，相信警察不会滥用他们以这种方式。
警察到达八十○英里每小时是一种更好的方式来阻止罪犯比子弹到达八○○英里每小时。
，由于在俄克拉何马城爆炸案的刀点劫持9月11日，我们应采取枪远离人们谁没有参与。
一名警官说， 21岁以下不能购买枪下班使用，因为他的能力取决于此蓝色外套。
人们购买枪支作为“替代虎鞭” ，因为他们知道，只有人与小阴茎以往任何时候都获得攻击罪犯。
希特勒和斯大林没有解除公民，只有犹太人，吉普赛人，同性恋者，工会和其他“不受欢迎” 。（是的，一个自由的力学会员表示，这实际上在华盛顿邮报引述www.potomac - inc.org 。）
要正确理解纳粹枪支管制，必须考虑到“合理担心”他们的犹太居民。（这是另一个自封自由。我开始怀疑。）
这对有孩子的家庭不应该允许自己的枪，为安全起见，就像他们不允许自己的狗，电动工具，或有毒化学品。
这是错误的，以破坏别人的生活行政犯罪的监禁和贫困家庭，除非该犯罪是拥有一支枪。
这一项法律，允许某人保持这样的“ X ”的法律已经多年，在面对另一个严重的书面法律，说他们不能做的“ Y ” ，是一个“漏洞” 。
这是错误的政治，世界贸易中心的攻击并不需要枪劫持飞机，但好政治的科伦杀手...非法购买枪支。
，当有人去世，因为他们不能得到药物，政府也不会批准，这是悲惨的，但如果有人死亡，因为他们不能保卫自己的郡政府也不会批准，这就是生活。
这是某种犯罪的威胁更大了会议，而不是一个经常的人，所以警方需要枪和普通市民没有。
这枪是一种象征，白色的男性压迫，我们应该解决这个禁止廉价枪支，也可向贫困少数民族，枪不到六英镑触发拉这是可用的女性和男性小，需要特别的存储和许可费，以一站式“的那些人”由他们提供，要求证明“需要” ，如政治关系或大面积或钱去昂贵之旅，而这一切将停止这些邪恶的白人男性。
各国政府应坚持“合法垄断武力” ，因为美国革命家，在Maquissards ，以色列在巴勒斯坦和北方联盟在阿富汗是“非法的” ，但希特勒，毛泽东，波尔布特，墨索里尼和斯大林是“合法的。 ”
认为“合理”使用的枪是狩猎和射击，但不是自卫。换言之，这是可以接受的，把他们当作玩具而不是作为救生设备。
这0.50口径的步枪都是“极为罕见的”和“卖hotcakes 。 ”
这一个事实，即0.50口径步枪是非常罕见的理由禁止他们，就像罕见Lamborghinis和其它高性能汽车的理由禁止他们。
这人有道义上的义务，使公民的逮捕时，人们看到有重罪的进展，并应完成的犯罪行为人大喊大叫， “住手！不然我就大叫'一站式'了！ ” 而不是利用的武器。
这聪明人应该支持枪支管制，因为他们意识到他们太愚蠢到相信枪。
这枪只是不够取代阴茎，因此，当袭击，丑角应撤出了...
这枪是一个象征性的阴茎...什么这与捍卫自己的生活我不知道。它只是为了证明，反防御精神科医生显然弗洛伊德问题，他们需要解决。
如果诚实的人们放弃他们的武器，罪犯和独裁者将放弃他们，因为芝加哥街头帮派和希特勒已经证明。
只有政府应控制枪支一样，只有政府应控制广播，只有政府应控制宗教。
一个演员从好莱坞谁点一支枪在朋友和敌人而不歧视，谁保持手指扣在扳机上，没有目标，谁火一把手枪在其侧，谁火灾两支枪Akimbo公司，谁试图打出一个单一行动手枪以降低锤，谁火灾60投30发弹弹匣，应作为一个专家关于这个问题的。
这“合理的许可费”将停止休闲所有权的枪，但任何人谁会跳火圈，以拥有一支枪是强迫。
这是非法携带枪支将阻止人们这样做，就像降低车速限制停止鲁莽驾驶。
我们应该处理的问题，罪犯使用非法武器，采取合法的武器以外的老实人。
我们应该禁止枪，如果这样可以节省甚至生命，这是值得的，正如我们应该禁止集会，人们可能会践踏致死，如果这样可以节省一个生命，这是值得的，我们应该禁止的团体谁讲话违反公共秩序，如果这样可以节省一个生命，这是值得的，我们应该禁止不健康的食品，如果这样可以节省一个生命，这是值得的，并...
任何人被定罪的家庭暴力不应该允许处理枪，除非该犯罪是“ Marky ”马克沃尔伯格处理枪支“猩球。 ”
这种步枪是无用的世界战斗机和核武器，就像汽车是无用的世界747 。
这天空马绍尔群岛，谁是目前的不到10 ％的航班，是一个很好的解决劫机事件，但武装的飞行员，谁在场的每飞行，却不是。
一个试点可能意外打出一个洞， 0.38口径的飞机，从而造成某种神秘一点○○○万立方英尺空气中消失了一会儿，或触及关键电线不知这是不是重复的另一安全，尽管联邦政府要求该效果，但“训练空军马歇尔”不会做到这一点，即使在紧张的战斗对劫机者。
飞行员可能会意外地打出了一个洞皮肤的飞机（见上文），因此不应该有枪，如果恐怖分子开始撞了，我们就会有希望做到最好。
飞行员不应武装，因为它们没有训练使用武器，但也可能使用暴力演习，他们没有训练，以确保某种神奇劫机者，他们无法看到他的座位上。
一个.38口径的子弹可能摧毁飞机，但暴力演习不会撕裂的翅膀起飞。
拍摄的试点，通过一个小驾驶舱门在传入劫机者migh某种不施加任何子弹，但他在看到一百一磅乘务员将轻松获得足够接近解决劫机者和使用电枪。
恐怖可能伪装成一个“受信任的旅行者” ，希望是唯一的人乘坐的枪支，但将永远无法假冒，执法人员找到工作，或作为一个试点。
一个没有受过训练的飞行员在对付恐怖分子，因此应该留在驾驶舱内。相反，它的行动的乘务员和乘客的处理情况。毕竟，他们是训练有素的专业人员。
这只是一个时间的问题，直到发生劫持，并没有什么我们可以做的东西，不，你不能携带枪支。
许多“第二修正案的支持者权利”赞同“合理的枪支管制， ”就像许多“第一修正案的支持者权利”赞同“合理的媒体控制。 ”
保持一支枪自卫意味着希望拍摄某人一样，保持比赛并业主保险意味着愿望是纵火犯。
一个朋克唤醒一个上午，并认为， “哎呀，不是抢劫，强奸， sodomizing和杀害一名年轻女子，为什么不我想谈谈我的枪在400美元的20美元和比萨饼和麦当劳去工作吗？ ”
这更无助您，您的安全由罪犯。
你应该让盗匪你的钱包，因为他并不真的想要你开枪，他会告诉你，但你应该给他你的钱包，因为他会拍你如果您没有。
尽管所有的愤怒对企业美国的傲慢的员工待遇，达美乐比萨的需求，员工是手无寸铁的是一种利他主义的努力，以阻止他们伤害自己，而不是计算金融出价，以避免了诉讼死强盗的家人。
该郡的业主是“潜在的恐怖分子” ，因为他们拥有所有必要的设备，就像萨拉布雷迪是一个“潜在的妓女” ，因为她有一切必要的设备。
你可以起诉一家商店有一个光滑的地板，天花板下降，和夏普的角落，但如果他们拒绝，让您携带一支枪和你拍摄的犯罪，他们是不负责执行这一规则与他人。
没有权利自卫，和警察在法律上没有义务回应我呼救时，解除武装，但你可以起诉他们，如果他们采取太长去的一宗交通意外。
该武装的警察只是“升级的暴力行为” ，因此要真正有效，我们应该禁止使用nightsticks警察。事实上，我们应该禁止警察。如果他们不存在，罪犯不会需要武装。事实上，我们不应该有锁的门，因为这只是鼓励强行进入。
这冲锋枪过于强大的追捕鹿，麋鹿，太危险，公民个人拥有，但也无能为力的现代战争，太弱，无法可靠地杀死士兵，并没有任何地位的概念，公民储备。
有没有不协调的人的首选武器，毒品交易商是25美元.22口径袖珍手枪，并声称的首选武器，毒品交易商是$ 2000机枪在同一块宣传。
任何便宜的武器是一种“特殊的星期六晚上， ”和任何昂贵的武器是一种“攻击的武器。 ”
说， “警察”和其他节目的编辑，以显示无聊遇到交通站及偶尔喝醉酒的傻瓜的左轮手枪在他的口袋里，并没有表现出数以百万计的情况下，警察正在射杀成群结队的机枪toting毒贩。
说： “纽约市警察局蓝色”和“迈阿密风云”的纪录片。
这入侵者将无行为能力的催泪瓦斯或烤箱喷涂，但如果拍摄的0.44 Magnum将对生气您的报复和杀死你。
枪支在手中的私人公民的最严重威胁世界和平，中国，巴基斯坦和韩国可以信任与核武器。
这查尔顿赫斯顿主席的全国步枪协会是一个抬价谁应该被忽视，但迈克尔道格拉斯的代表手枪控制公司是一个和平大使谁有权观众在联合国武器控制问题。
普通的人，在场的枪，变成屠夫屠宰，并恢复正常时，核武器被删除。
有人谁没有明确他的武器，不点它放在一个安全的方向发展，拉动了扳机不检查室，并打击了他的脚是一个例子，说明即使是“训练有素的专业”可以是一个“受害者”的恶魔枪，但人民军队的武器谁清理数以百万计的一年没有受到伤害是“哑巴过日子。 ”
新英格兰医学杂志充满了专家咨询有关枪支，就像枪和弹药的一些优秀论文的心脏手术。
任何人都不应协商的汽车安全带安全工程师，土木工程师的一个更好的桥梁，为脊髓神经外科瘫痪，计算机程序员的Y2K问题，和萨拉布雷迪枪支的专门知识。
现代设计的枪支控制的功能，如玻璃钢框杂志和股票，这是用于军事目的，不应该提供给平民，就像现代设计汽车包含的功能，如齿轮齿条式转向和麦克弗森支柱，这是专为赛道不应该提供给平民。
这种步枪如线AR - 15 ， AK - 47步枪和L1 - A1s被用于军事射击和不应该提供给平民，就像汽车一样雪佛兰Suburbans ，吉普车，越野车和设计的武器平台和军事用途和不应该提供给平民。
的最佳途径，以避免发生意外枪击事件是保持完全无知的枪和从来没有在他们的身边，就像最安全的方式，以避免发生意外溺水是完全无知的住宿和游泳永远不会近水。
，最好的事情我们的孩子可以做恶霸和毒贩是“只说没有” ，并反击，最好的一件事我们可以做歹徒和恶棍是给他们50元，等待他们走开。
这是令人不能容忍的密尔沃基警方45分钟以应对报告杰弗里Dahmer的最后受害者奔跑裸体在寒冷的，然后返回他的攻击者没有检查身份证，但最好的一个公民可以做是在紧急情况下拨打911 。
说， “人民享有和平集会” ， “正确的人是安全的家园” ， “本文所列举的某些权利不得被解释为贬低他人的人保留了” ， “权力不能授予此处保留给国分别和人民“ ，是指个人，而是”人民有权持有和携带武器“指的是国家。
这第2次修订，批准了1791年，允许各国有一个国民卫队设立的国会法案，于1916年。
该国民警卫队，支付由联邦政府，占财产租赁给联邦政府，使用武器的拥有由联邦政府，惩罚入侵者根据联邦法律，是一个国家机构。
尽管1990年案件明尼苏达州州长鲁迪Perpich与美国国防部，在最高法院裁定特别指出，国民警卫队是根据联邦订单和国家总督不能反对，国民警卫队仍然是，事实上，一国民兵。
说，公民个人不能有手枪，因为它们没有民兵的目的，尽管军方已数以十万计的人，和公民个人不能有突击步枪，因为他们是军事武器。
这是合理的，加州的最低刑期为2年，但不使用拥有一支突击步枪，以及合理的加利福尼亚州有6个月的最低刑期为强奸一名女警官。
这是合理的加州获得两年监禁的严重罪行如拥有，但不使用核武器，并缓刑的未成年人犯罪，如性骚扰你的子女。
这是合理的监狱人携带枪支，但没有使用，但令人发指的监狱人藏有大麻。
最低判决违反公民权利，除非这是藏有一支枪。
这门到门搜索毒品是一种严重侵犯公民权利和法西斯主义的迹象，但挨家挨户搜寻枪是一种合理的解决办法“枪问题” 。
第一修正案绝对让儿童色情制品和威胁要杀死警察，但并不适用于手册枪维修。
死刑不是犯罪的威慑，但枪控制。
一名女子在microskirt ，香水和Wonderbra ，没有内衣，是一个无助的受害者，但有人获得付款600小时提供现金快餐地方银行在同一时间是每天晚上， “要求它。 “ 您将不会允许任何人携带枪支。
这伊利诺伊'法，让几乎所有的政府官员向总督dogcatcher携带枪支是合理的，法律禁止任何私人公民，即使是与死亡威胁的50个文件和100万美元珠宝生意携带了枪支是合理的。和它不是一个迹象警察stateism 。
这80个宗教kooks在韦科威胁到美国安全，但狙击手杀害他们，他们离开大楼， machinegunning儿童，隐藏的录像证据，可能烧毁建设目的的，并在任何情况下，提出在美国联邦法院是好的执法。和它不是一个迹象警察stateism 。
，言论自由的权利人自己的报纸，发报机，电脑，打字机，但只有自卫理由赤手空拳。
随着上述情况，有90名妇女遭到的LB 300的LB强奸犯和他的300的LB好友，有“权”要杀死他们的自卫，只要她用她的双手。
有没有在宪法中明确禁止禁止某些枪，但也有一些是在宪法中明确禁止禁止某些性行为。
这枪的安全课程，学校只鼓励孩子实施暴力，但在学校的性教育不鼓励孩子们发生性关系。
有某个犯罪将枪远离您，并用它来对付你，所以反过来说，最好的办法是威胁时采取的犯罪的枪远离他和我们对他的好感。
这容易获得枪支今天，只有少数几个政府的形式，等待时间，支票，侵权，身份证，和指纹，负责所有的校园枪击事件，而缺乏校园枪击事件在1950年和1960年的，这是所造成的尴尬情况枪支在任何五金店，加油站和邮购。
我们必须摆脱枪疯狂的疯子，因为可能会就枪击事件在任何时候，但只要谁拥有枪支的恐惧，这样的疯子是妄想。
有太多的暴力行为具有明确枪在电视上，但城市可以起诉枪支制造商，因为人们不知道所涉及的危险枪支。
枪杆子游说试图运行一个“请勿触摸”的宣传运动的孩子处理枪是宣传和反枪游说试图运行一个“请勿触摸”运动负责社会活动。
说的犯罪率正在下降，因为美国的枪支管制，但犯罪增加，需要更多的枪支管制。
100年成立后，进入了全国步枪协会的政治枪从纯粹自私的动机，和100年后的解放宣言，黑人民权运动的成立，从纯粹的高尚动机。
统计显示高谋杀率证明枪支管制，统计数字显示，越来越多的谋杀率是在枪支管制立法是“公正的统计资料。 ”
我们不需要枪对暴虐的政府，因为宪法内部保障，所以我们应该抓住一切禁令和枪，因此违反了第2 ，第4 ，第5和第9次修订的宪法，并不会因此成为一个暴虐的政府。
这枪是一个无效的手段自卫的合理成年人，但手中的一个无知犯罪成为威胁到社会结构。
这枪是如此复杂，使用这种特殊的训练是必要的正确使用，但使用简单，他们使谋杀容易。
这枪有助于高死亡率和应被禁止，但烟草和酒精是好的。
这一枪导致犯罪，这就是为什么从来没有发生过大规模杀害在枪查看。
这一枪导致犯罪，就像火柴引起纵火。
这一枪导致犯罪，就像妇女事业卖淫。
这一枪导致犯罪，就像男人事业强奸。
这枪是没有必要的国防，这就是为什么美军只能有3万人。
，禁止枪支的作品，这就是为什么纽约，华盛顿，芝加哥警察需要枪对武装犯罪分子。
妇女一样的智能和能力的男子，但妇女的枪是“意外事故等情况发生。 ”
妇女一样的智能和能力的男人，但gunmaker的广告，针对妇女的“侵害他们的恐惧。 ”
这一支手枪，与多达4个开关和控制，是过于复杂，典型的成人学习和使用，而不是汽车的只有20 。
这是有益的手枪只以谋杀罪，这就是为什么警察和军队确定它们作为防御性武器。
邻居说，携带枪支谁对偶尔疯狂的偏执，因为名正言顺担心，每一个他们正在等待变成一个疯子。
一个占人口多数的支持枪支管制，就像一个大多数人口的用于支持拥有奴隶。
任何人都不应忽视的白痴政客谁混淆Wicca与撒旦教和夸大同性恋社会对社会的一种威胁，但听内圣政治家谁可以指的是自动装弹小手臂为“大规模杀伤性武器”和“攻击核武器“ ，使用”子弹套管， “不知道之间的差别”剪辑“和”杂志， “不能告诉之间的区别了AKM ，一个麦90 ，和SKS 。
不存在绝对权利的武器，记录历史，因为英国政府用来禁止天主教徒拥有枪支。这是不是一个标志宗教偏见。（注：英国宪法实际上恢复新教徒有权拥有武器，其中天主教詹姆斯二世剥夺了他们。）
该步枪与手枪对付的攻击性武器，就像车辆赛车条纹的跑车。
您不需要对侵略者的枪，因为政府会知道在足够的时间问题，你需要什么武器。
这是马萨诸塞州的安全与禁止枪支，这就是为什么特迪肯尼迪机枪- toting警卫。
，大多数人不能信任，所以我们应该有法律禁止枪支，其中大多数人将遵守，因为它们能够被信任。
一名妇女被强奸，勒死她的内裤在道德上是绝对的女性吸烟枪和死的强奸犯在她的脚下。
That Cary Nation, referring to wine and beer as "Demon Rum" and "Spirits" was an obvious kook, but Sarah Brady, and Diane Whinesteen referring to self-loading sporting rifles as "Military Assault Weapons" and "Weapons of Mass Destruction"是知识分子。
认为“有权保持和携带武器”是指徽章徽章和大衣的武器，而不是武器。（波托马克- inc.org ）
枪支认为，因此应予禁止的危险向公众参与，但生活报告从战场，它可以使敌人部队部署的通知，让几千名士兵死亡，也许失去一场战争，是一个受保护的行为，不能损害对。
的权利明确少女色情网站的存在是不容置疑的，因为它是一个受宪法保护的延长人权法案，但声称，手枪是为了自卫，只是一个借口而已，并没有真正的保护人权法案。
这是美国公民自由联盟是好事，因为它毫不妥协地维护某些部分的宪法，但是，全国步枪协会来说是个坏，因为它维护的其他部分的宪法。
有房子，有个郡的三倍可能有谋杀，就像一所房子与胰岛素的三倍可能有糖尿病。
警方在团体备份，这就是为什么他们需要更大容量的杂志比平民，谁就有必须面对罪犯，因此需要较少的弹药。
我们必须禁止销售枪支通过在报纸分类广告的情况下，恐怖看到的广告，苍蝇半个地球，购买枪支，并用它来犯下的恐怖行为，而不是使用一个数以百万计的武器留下的“负责任”的政府后，其殖民暴行。
这致电911 ，并要求他们派一名男子用枪来保护你是好的，但削减了中间人的保护自己是坏的。
人们谁自己的枪了对犯罪的恐惧是偏执的，但人谁不想让其他人自己的枪的情况下，使它们犯下的罪行是合理的。
这一枪导致自杀率高在美国，尽管日本的利率几乎高出三倍。
我们应该禁止郡学校附近的商店，因为所有的10岁谁购买枪支没有父母的同意。
有一个雕像所谓“武力自由”在国会山，但是，这是不相干的意图，我们的祖先。
我们应该禁止“周六夜特价”和其他廉价的枪，因为它是不公平的穷人获得枪支太多。
这一枪没有合法使用，但不喝酒，这就是为什么我们的问题不是警察枪啤酒。
That police and soldiers are the dregs of society who were unfit to get any real job, which perfectly qualifies them with the high moral standards and keen intellects to handle these complicated tools and be our guardians.
That it's acceptable to arm a courier at $6 an hour to shoot criminals for stealing bank deposits, but unacceptable for a college-educated business owner to do it himself.
That a registration plan will reduce crime, because criminals will register their guns despite the Supreme Court decision Haynes v. US (309 US 85, 1968) that registration violates self-incrimination.
That it's reasonable to require proof of a criminal act before an order of protection can be issued, but reasonable to assume anyone with a gun will commit a criminal act, so they should be subject to prior restraint.
That teaching abstinence exclusively rather than use of condoms is doomed to fail, but encouraging absolute bans on guns rather than education in safe use is the only acceptable method of reducing crime.
That it is outrageous that civilians have rifles that were designed for the military for their own self defense, but perfectly okay to have polluting, potentially unstable, heavy vehicles that were designed for the military simply as status symbols.
That guns are the gravest threat to society because 83,000,000 gun owners didn't commit a crime yesterday.
That it is essential to incorporate locks and sensors into guns to make them safer and that only a criminal would not support this, but cops and federal agents would be exempt for safety reasons because locks are unreliable and hinder access.
That a bank guard can protect money with a gun, but you cannot protect your children with one.
That all gun dealers sell illegal weapons, just like all black people sell drugs.
That crime is higher in urban areas with less guns, and we must continue to disarm the minorities in these areas because of the risk of crime, and that isn't bigotry.
That an underpaid, overworked bodyguard should be glad to throw himself in front of a bullet for you.
That your safety is someone else's responsibility, but they have no right to tell you how to live your life.
That guns are useless against tyranny, because an armed populace of 160 million cannot defeat an army of 2 million mixed in among it. Oddly, the person claiming this has no credentials in strategic operations.
That if the above is true, we should not be terrified of the concept of that government holding control of our lives and freedom at its whim.
That the piecemeal destruction of the right to keep and bear arms makes the right useless, and therefore justifies destroying it further.
That one should be more afraid of one's spouse blowing a gasket and shooting the children, than of those children being run over by a hormone-driven teenager in a car.
"It can't happen here."
That people are too stupid to handle guns, but are intelligent enough to vote.
That guns are not an effective means of self-defense, which is why police carry them.
That one can "study" the "gun issue," but not know the difference between an assault rifle and a battle rifle.
That the NRA, with over 4 million members, is "out of touch" with America, and HCI, with 50 thousand members, is a "mandate from the people."
That a baseball bat is good protection against a burglar, provided his gun fires baseballs.
That to judge a group by secondhand news and hearsay is bigotry, unless that group is the NRA.
That the National Defense Act of 1916 doesn't exist.
That pricing products out of the reach of poor people through excessive regulation is discriminatory practice, unless that product is a gun.
That manufacturers are not responsible for damages caused by their products, unless that product is a gun.
That trigger locks and other devices make guns safer, which is why the police and military refuse to use them.
That registration of guns will help law enforcement, because that way they won't need probable cause and a warrant to conduct a search.
That registration of guns, which makes their existence a matter of public knowledge under the FOIA, isn't dangerous to owners.
That registration of guns, in violation of the McClure-Volkmer Act, and as declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, is somehow still legal.
That the gun-toting rednecks at Saratoga and Yorktown caused the Revolution, and the British forces were intent on providing peace to North America.
That private citizens making private sales of private property is a "loophole."
That the existence of weapons not banned by previous laws is a "loophole."
That making it harder to get a license to sell firearms legally will reduce the number of people selling illegally.
That it's safer to do nothing than resist with a gun, which is why the military wins so many wars by not fighting.
That we must close shooting ranges because of the noise, but ban silencers because they are quiet.
That owning a gun for self-defense indicates an intent to kill, just like owning a first aid kit indicates an intent to impersonate a physician.
That guns are an "epidemic" even though we can't treat them with penicillin.
That there's no right to own military weapons, which is why the Civilian Marksmanship Program at http://www.odcmp.com exists to sell military weapons to civilians under Congressional authority.
That suggesting teachers be armed is an outrageous suggestion for a "civilized" society, which is why the Swiss and Israelis do it.
That making it harder and harder for even cops to have guns on school property will somehow make it harder for lunatics to kill the utterly helpless students.
That accidents with a product justify banning the product, even though MADD has never called for a ban on alcohol, people actively push to legalize drugs, and no one wants to ban swimming pools, so basically it's only practical items like guns we should ban and not the luxury items that are essential to human survival.
That a high percentage of immigrants own guns as an overreaction to the living conditions in their nations of origin, but the US should try to emulate those nations' gun control and social policies.
That the 14th Amendment requires states to accept each other's drivers licenses, even with age or vision requirement differences, marriage licenses even with age or relationship differences or if it's a gay marriage, but somehow doesn't apply to licenses to carry weapons.
That the same people who build illegal high-tech drug labs for less than $30,000 won't build illegal low-tech gun shops for less than $10,000.
That people with large gun collections are dangerous, especially if they have more than two hands to shoot with.
That autoloaders are "easily converted" to fully automatic fire, yet the person telling you this has no idea how it's accomplished.
That banning rifles with bayonet lugs will cut down on all the drive-by bayonetings.
That shooting at an intruder who smashes your door and enters with knife in hand will somehow "escalate the violence."
That it's safer with less guns, which is why lunatics shoot up schools instead of gun shows or police stations.
That guns cause crime, which is why there was no rape or murder in the Dark Ages.
That stopping the people who don't commit murder from having guns will lessen the number of those who do commit murder.
That since banning a few guns hasn't helped, we should ban more.
That just like the anti-nuclear weapons movement used to believe, if the potential victims disarm, the oppressors will take pity on them and give up their weapons in remorse.
That oppressing gun owners until they violate the law justifies oppressing them further.
That "crime guns" and old police guns should be destroyed at government expense, because the cost of exorcising the evil spirits from them before selling them to lawful owners is exorbitant.
That raising the legal age to possess firearms from 18 to 21 will REALLY show those 16 year olds.
That inner-city blacks in public housing should be disarmed to prevent crimes, but not rich white suburbanites. And it isn't a sign of racism.
That creating firearms crime by having a Byzantine code of firearm laws proves there's a problem, and justifies more laws to create more crime.
That liberal parents who give guns to problem children to "teach them responsibility" are not responsible for the deaths they cause, but everyone else's guns are.
That gun owners are a threat by existing that must be destroyed by any means possible and their rights are unimportant, but the thugs who attack us on the street whom the gun owners wish to be armed against are simply a problem we have to put up with.
That one should judge all gun owners by the acts of a few criminals, just like one should judge all blacks by the acts of a few inner-city crack dealers.
That making it harder to get firearms legally will reduce their illegal use, just like making it harder to get a prescription will cut down on the illicit drug trade.
That it's tragic when a child dies in a firearms accident, and we must pass restrictive laws to prevent it, but children poisoned by household chemicals are simply unavoidable accidents.
That you don't need a gun, therefore no one needs one, and you have the right to impose that belief and will on others.
That stupidity can be cured by legislation.
That societies with less guns have less killings by guns, just like societies with less cars have less vehicular homicide. This is deemed to be relevant.
That criminals who rob to support their drug habit can afford $65 a minute in ammunition for their automatic "Weapon of choice."
That with nationwide gun control, the entire nation can be as safe as NYC, LA and Chicago.
That since a gun isn't 100% effective for self defense, you should get rid of it, along with your first aid kit and fire extinguisher, since they aren't 100% effective, either.
That if a violent criminal enters your house, you should do nothing and wait for the police arrive, just as you'd do nothing for an injury or fire and wait for the fire truck or the ambulance.
That if Chicago were to legalize firearms, it would have shootouts in the streets, which never happens now.
That it's wrong to use tax dollars to finance private political agendas, unless that agenda is to ban guns.
That a "safe gun" will help stop criminal misuse of firearms just like "safe sex" works so well to stop rape.
That a cop with felonies on his record is safe with fully automatic weapons but a churchgoing mother with a parking ticket as her worst crime is unfit to use a pistol to protect her child.
That a suicide who used a gun would still be alive if he or she had used a knife or hanged himself or herself.
That someone else's suicide is a problem for the rest of us that would be prevented if we gave up our guns.
That alcohol is acceptable in private, as long as the user doesn't use it while driving, but mere possession of a gun is a threat to others.
That gun owners are unwilling to compromise, which is why there are only 20,000 gun laws in the US.
That criminals are better shots than civilians because of all the time they spend on the practice range.
That since criminals are better shots by the logic above, one is safer by not shooting back, but just waiting for them to run out of ammo.
That it's reasonable to assume an accident would have been lethal if the victim wasn't wearing a seatbelt, and reasonable to assume that an armed defender would have been safe even if they didn't have a gun.
That one accidental death is too many, but thousands of people dying because the means of self-defense were not available is unavoidable and not worthy of worry.
That we should ban guns because people have a "right to feel safe," but the right to feel safe by owning firearms for defense is not valid.
That it's outrageous to count 18 and 19 year-old parents as "children" for statistical purposes, but perfectly acceptable to count them as children for purposes of exaggerating gun deaths among "children."
That a zero-tolerance policy is bad regarding drugs, but a zero-tolerance policy is good regarding guns.
That martial arts are a better form of self-defense, and can defeat an armed opponent, but we still need to ban guns because of the danger they present to those few people who don't know karate.
That government officials can be trusted with automatic weapons, but private citizens cannot, because of the number of people private citizens kill while kicking in doors without search warrants.
That an 18 year old can handle a machinegun and die defending another nation's oil reserves, thereby being a hero, but an 18 year old who tries to defend his or her child with a gun belongs in jail.
That the few people who can't use martial arts or other non-lethal means of self-defense-the young, the old, the infirm, the disabled, the weak, the small, and the pregnant-are simply the necessary sacrifice we must make to criminals to avoid the risks of letting people be armed. This is not bigotry.
That the dangers of guns outweigh their recreational uses, unlike alcohol and motorcycles.
That getting rid of guns reduces violence, so the military should be armed with bouquets of flowers.
That we should hang out at funeral homes to tell the families of the deceased how lucky they are their loved one was killed by a drunk and not a man with a gun.
That a conservative with a dozen guns is an "extremist," and a liberal with a dozen guns is a "museum."
That a team of cops shooting an unarmed citizen 19 times and not getting charged with murder is "law enforcement" but an old lady shooting a knife-wielding attacker is "vigilanteism," and we should leave defense to the professionals.
That we should require trigger locks and safe storage facilities for all guns in order to prevent accidents, just like we require all household chemicals to be kept in a locked cabinet.
That a woman shooting a rapist is a felon.
That NORML is good for supporting legalization of a politically unpopular product, but the NRA is bad for supporting legalization of a politically unpopular product.
That poor people who live in high crime areas and can't afford alarms shouldn't be allowed to have guns either.
That telling a murderer he'll go to jail for carrying a gun will make him think twice.
That the only way to end gun violence is to ban guns, just like the only way to end medical malpractice is to ban doctors.
That killing a triple murderer so you don't become the fourth victim is "escalating the violence."
That we should get rid of "junk guns" so that criminals are forced to use reliable high-quality guns.
That repealing laws that discriminate against gun-owners "endorses" guns, just like repealing laws that discriminate against gays "endorses" homosexuality.
That guns are designed only to kill, just like women are designed only to give birth.
That only people over 21 are allowed to defend themselves.
That we should ban guns because their primary purpose is to kill people, but we shouldn't ban alcohol, which has its primary purpose getting intoxicated and losing control of the higher faculties, thereby increasing violence and accidental death.
That according to "Professor" Michael Bellesiles, the lack of mention of firearms in Colonial literature proves their scarcity, much like the lack of mention of outhouses proves their scarcity.
That somehow the above is more relevant to the 2nd Amendment than the lack of letters to public officials and newspapers is relevant to the 1st Amendment.
That a person who would commit violence with a gun would never do so with a knife.
That most people are seething cauldrons of potential violence who cannot be trusted with a gun, but most people are so decent that there is no need to carry a weapon for defense.
That a person foolish enough to leave a gun loaded and lying in reach of a child will somehow be responsible enough to attach a trigger lock.
That 83 million gun owners are "extremists," and the 50,000 members of the Million Moron March are "the majority."
That allowing concealed carry does not reduce crime through deterrence since some people do so even though it's illegal, but allowing concealed carry increases crime, because more people carry guns and use them irresponsibly. (Brady Bunch)
That a woman buying a gun to defend herself against a violent ex needs five days to "cool off."
That a woman being raped should refuse help from an armed stranger, and instead wait for the police.
That if the Million Moron March protesters feels threatened, they should ask police with guns to protect them while they tell everyone how worthless guns are for protection.
That a trauma surgeon's experience in treating gunshot wounds makes him an expert on gun control legislation, just like an automobile body repair technician's experience repairing cars makes him an expert on traffic laws.
That the typical town only needs one law enforcement officer per 1000 population, because most people are law abiding, but that it's dangerous to let citizens carry weapons because most people are criminal.
That the risk of arrest for carrying a weapon on school grounds will stop a person bent on suicide from starting a shootout.
That felons should be denied the right to ever own a weapon, just like rapists should be castrated before being released from jail.
That the 1939 US vs Miller case, is "established law" that endorses gun control and the matter is closed, just like Plessy vs Ferguson endorsed "separate but equal" schools and the matter is closed.
That game wardens have the most dangerous job in the world, because everyone they deal with is armed.
That there's no risk of the US becoming a police state, Japanese-Americans were not interned in the 40's, blacks were not oppressed and jailed in the 50's, and no students were killed at Kent State.
That when the government promises that they won't confiscate our weapons after we register them, we can believe them, as did the Commanche, the Sioux, the Apache, the Kaw, the Cree, the Blackfoot, the Italians in NYC, the Jews in Germany, the Zulu in South Africa…and the Americans at Lexington and Concord.
That the government can control guns as well as it controls drugs.
That the high crime rate in cities with oppressive gun control proves the need for gun control in cities without gun control and with low crime.
That Charlton Heston, as president of the NRA, must be a racist, despite his marches with Dr. King in the 1960s. After all, all gun owners are racist, and that theory isn't bigoted.
That we don't need guns because America is safe, and only criminals or people wishing to start trouble would be out late at night in bad neighborhoods.
That according to Diane Whinestein, there is no left-wing conspiracy to send police and troops to imprison American gun owners, but there is a vast, right-wing conspiracy of gun owners who must be disarmed for attempting to stop it.
That .50 caliber weapons must be banned in case Americans use them to shoot holes in the armored cars that the government doesn't own and isn't going to send against them, also according to Diane Whinestein.
That ships using Australian waters mustn't carry handguns against the mythical threat of piracy or mutiny, because some aspiring captain might sell them for a few bucks.
That gang punks shot by other gang punks are innocent victims, and babies shot by government agents deserve to die because of the unpopular beliefs of their parents.
That allowing the poor and minorities to defend themselves is Fascist.
That small arms can't win wars, as all the Viet Cong bombing, air superiority, and naval missions prove.
That John Wayne, rejected by the Marines for bad knees, who portrayed firearms as used by soldiers and law enforcement is a draft-dodging agent of evil, but antigun draft dodger Sylvester Stallone, making movies about Vietnam veterans and using weapons gratuitously, is an American hero to be slobbered over.
That violence is bad, but any defensive use of a firearm that doesn't involve the death of the perpetrator is invalid.
That the NRA is bad for running political activities, but the Million Moron March, stealing money from AIDS research, illegally maintaining tax-exempt status as a 501c(3) organization and fraudulently using a hospital rent-free as its headquarters is good for running political activities.
That Charlton Heston is evil for working for the NRA for free, but Sarah Brady charging $10,000 a speech is a paragon of altruism.
That a ranch rifle made after 1994 is somehow a military rifle.
That all firearms retailers are illegal gun dealers, just like all pharmacists are illegal drug dealers.
That hate is not a family value, but all gun owners are tobacco-chawin', beer-swillin', racist, redneck bubbas.
That a gun which sits silently in a drawer and costs pennies per round to shoot is a bad idea for self defense, but a dog that requires walks, veterinary care, and licenses, may not be allowed in certain neighborhoods and may annoy the neighbors at all hours is a good idea for self defense.
That the worst thing one can do if there's an intruder in the house is get a gun and apprehend them, and the best thing on can do is pretend to be asleep and wait for them to go away, especially if they are raping your children.
That gun control will "keep guns out of the wrong hands," meaning law-abiding Americans' hands.
That trigger locks do not interfere with the ability to use a gun for defensive purposes, which is why it makes sense that police officers are exempt from using them on their duty weapons.
That the government attempting to stop the Microsoft "monopoly" is good, and the Federal government pressuring cities to buy guns only from Smith & Wesson is also good, and not monopolistic.
That "assault weapons" have no purpose other than to kill large numbers of people, which is why the police need them.
That "assault weapons" are only designed for killing offensively, and the police need them but you do not.
That citizens don't need to carry a gun for personal protection but desk-bound police administrators who work in a building filled with cops do, as do tax auditors, vegetable inspectors, mail inspectors, and meat inspectors.
That beer-gutted police have special mental, emotional and physical capabilities that enable them to deal with the incredible complexity of a firearm, and private citizens can never hope to achieve such competence.
That the Brady Act and the "Assault Weapons" Ban which both went into effect in 1994 are responsible for the decrease in violent crime rates since 1991, and since 2004 when the AWB expired.
That 25% of the dealers at gun shows are unlicensed, and we must license these purveyors of books, tools, knives, clothing, artwork, candy and historical artifacts.
That because of New York's "tough laws" against guns, there exist black market dealers who spend thousands of dollars in gas and other expenses to drive to Arizona, which has "weak laws" in order to buy Ruger pistols at $500 each retail and drive back to New York and sell them to criminals at an "average" of $50 each, thereby making a profit. (Brady Bunch)
That there's no contradiction in the same liberals who said in the 60s that 18 year olds who could fight should be able to vote, now saying that 18 year olds can vote but shouldn't own guns.
That there are "secret lists of gun owners maintained by controversial organizations" such as the KKK and the Black Panthers, and that registration of guns will somehow prevent this. (Potomac-inc.org)
That a person with a gun that isn't registered is "armed outside the law," even though no such registration laws exist. (Potomac-inc.org)
That gun owners are all ignorant and stupid, but nevertheless belong to a huge, well-organized conspiracy that exists to destroy the nation. (Potomac-inc.org)
That the weapons that are useless for fighting crime and defending against tyranny or invasion will be the instruments of this dastardly plan. (Potomac-inc.org)
That 10 USC 310 and 10 USC 311 don't exist.
That suicides involving firearms are "gun deaths" but suicides involving knives are not "stabbing deaths."
That even though all white vans and Chevrolet Impalas are registered, they couldn't catch the DC murderers, because only gun registration will stop killings.
That "Weapons of Mass Destruction" in Iraq refers to an intact, armed nuke with a delivery system, but in the US refers to common self-loading rifles.
That an AK-47, designed in 1947 with a maximum effective range of 400 yards, was "designed to pierce police body armor" that didn't exist until the 1970s at "ranges over 1000 yards."
That there is a magic force called "kickback" that no one who works with firearms has ever heard of. It does not affect police or soldiers. "Kickback" causes a weapon to recoil, spontaneously aim itself at a loved one and automatically fire and kill them. "Kickback," while never having been observed, is a huge threat to safety and why "semiautomatic assault weapons" should never be sold to civilians.
That a good liberal opposes letting people use guns to defend themselves and their businesses because of the benefits of crime to police, insurance companies and large corporations who can afford the loss their smaller competitors can't. Only a "rightwinger" would support letting an individual engage in self-determination.
That we must ban guns with folding stocks, which have no "sporting purpose," so criminals can only get fixed stock rifles that are more accurate.
That you should wait until a severe emergency to get a gun, just as you should wait until it rains to fix the roof.
That it is acceptable to overwork interns, who will kill a few patients from fatigue-based carelessness, in order to make them better doctors and save more patients in the long run, but absolutely unacceptable for a law-abiding citizen to shoot anyone, even a rapist or murderer in the act.
That the number of accidental and suicidal deaths by drugs should not be included in statistics, but the number of accidental and suicidal deaths by guns should be.
That even despite that, when the risk of guns is lower than the risk of medical drugs, it's a "national tragedy."
That with only 1 chance in 5 of facing violent crime, and 1 chance in 10 of a gun being used defensively, the risk is minimal and gunowners are paranoid freaks, but it is insane not to get immunized against hepatitis, which strikes 1:50,000 people.
That 1:10,000 guns will be used to commit a crime, so we must get rid of them, and only 1:1000 people will have a dangerous reaction to an immunization so we must keep them.
That guns cause crime, even though crime has been shown to drop in areas with higher levels of gun ownership, and to rise where guns are restricted. This is due to "other factors." We should ignore those other factors and ban guns.
That a gun is a symbolic penis, and the person telling you this is a psychiatrist who drives a BMW.
That we should be scared of the people who own symbolic penises, but not of those who want to chop off all those symbolic penises. (thank you, L. Neil Smith)
That the Patriot Act, allowing the government to obtain library or bookstore records as ``an important tool for investigating and intercepting terrorism' even though they haven't done so is morally repugnant, but banning assault weapons that haven't been used in crime IS "An important tool for fighting crime and terrorism."
That guns in areas of the world like Afghanistan are frequently used in crime, and therefore guns are bad, just like doctors in Afghanistan have a high rate of patient loss, therefore doctors are bad.
That guns don't cause an increase in crime in low crime areas like Arlington, VA where they are available legally, but do cause an increase in crime in adjoining areas like Washington, DC where they are not available legally. The obvious solution to this is to make them illegal more places, which will make the crime rate go down to the level it is in places where they're legal.
That it's important to see that since the UK banned guns, they've had almost no crime with guns...er...well.
That some places have no guns, and no murder with guns, just like the US has no cricket bats, and no murder with cricket bats.
That ".50 caliber sniper rifles can bring down an airliner," and a .50BMG isn't very accurate.
That a single .50 caliber bullet can bring down an airliner, but the Air Force chooses to waste money on rapid fire 20mm cannon and missiles for this purpose, while the Army prefers missiles such as the Patriot.
That guns are not a good way for your neighbor to defend himself, so you should take them away from him. Or rather, have some other people with guns take them away from him, rather than risk getting hurt by his useless weapon.
That we are a peaceful society, and the way to deal with people who aren't peaceful is to send police and soldiers to peacefully persuade them with guns, and not resort to violence.
That the "gun show loophole" allows you to go to a gun show and find a federally licensed dealer surrounded by cops and federal agents and 10,000 buyers, who will wink and violate existing federal law by not requiring ID, a form 4473 and a call to NICS before selling you a gun, and neither of you will be arrested for the attempt.
That the "gun show loophole" allows you to go to a gun show and buy other things without a waiting period--like ammo, cleaning kits and books.
That the firearms industry is "unregulated." (http://www.atf.gov/firearms/faq/index.htm) (And that's just the FAQ.)
That fighting against a mugger makes one a "mercenary, fighting for money."
That the Army could save a lot of money taking the precision adjustable sights and optical sights off M16s, since they are "designed to be spray-fired from the hip." (According to Sarah Brady.)

Michael is an accomplished science fiction writer. His books include The Weapon , Confirmed Kill , Targets of Opportunity , The Hero , and The Scope of Justice .

If you enjoyed 40 Reasons to Support Gun Control , be sure to check out our entire archive of Political Humor .

政治幽默

40有理由支持枪支管制

这令人感到惊讶什么人相信相信在枪支管制